Conscious kid ID Card
Name:
Mike
Cognitive Level:
Memory and Focus:
Reading Skill:
Speech Development:
Anxiety:
Grade:
4th
School type:
homeschool
School Name:
Email:
Kid of Conscious Parent:
Emily Roberts
Date:
jan - 2025
results
Score
Information Proccessing Speed
Information Proccessing Focus
Conceptual-Intuitive Thinking
Linear Visual Thinking
Structural Visual Thinking
Dynamic Visual Thinking
Combinatory Visual Thinking
Conceptual-Logical Thinking
Short-Term Visual Memory
Short-Term Verbal Memory
Anxiety
Abstract Thinking
Speech Development
Conceptual-Imagery Thinking
Conceptual Categorization
Reading Skill
Representational System
Curriculum Fit Conclusion
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Score
Score
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Score
Performance Level
Error Analysis
Recommendations
Score
Performance Level
Recommendations
Score
Performance Level
Recommendations
Score
Performance Level
Recommendations
Score
Performance Level
Recommendations
Recommendations
Detailed Analysis
Performance Level
Error Analysis
Recommendations
Error Analysis
Recommendations
70%
Good Level
Good Level
Average Level, Normal
Good Level
Good Level
Good Level
Good Level
Good Level
Good Level
Average Level, Normal
High Level
High Level
Good Level
Low Level
Good Level
High Level
Balanced Representational System
*The analysis of incorrect answers is provided only for significant questions, where errors may indicate the use of alternative pre conceptual thinking patterns instead of the expected conceptual thinking. Recommendations are provided for cognitive skills that are assessed as being below age-appropriate expectations and are offered as guidance for further development.
96%
67%
92%
75%
75%
75%
83%
50%
44%
57%
100%
83%
25%
58%
100%
Strengths

Mike demonstrates well-developed linear and structural visual thinking, enabling effective analysis and synthesis of visual information. This strength supports learning in mathematics, science, and reading comprehension, especially when material is presented graphically or with visual aids. Mike’s dynamic and combinatory visual thinking are also strong, facilitating problem-solving and the ability to transfer skills across subjects such as math, physics, chemistry, and biology. Structural visual memory is a significant asset, allowing Mike to organize, transform, and later reinterpret information, which enhances long-term retention and understanding. Conceptual-logical and abstract thinking are well-developed, supporting the ability to generalize, reason, and synthesize complex ideas—key for success in higher-level math, science, and language arts. Verbal memory and speech development are also strong, aiding in reading comprehension, storytelling, and effective communication. Conceptual-imagery thinking is another area of strength, supporting visual analysis and intuitive connections in learning.

Challenges and Risks

Mike exhibits a high level of anxiety, which may disrupt academic performance and social interactions, leading to emotional fragility and difficulty coping with challenges. Categorization skills are associative and situational rather than systematic, which may hinder the development of structured scientific concepts and grammar acquisition in both native and foreign languages. Conceptual-intuitive thinking is at an average level, indicating a need for ongoing support to ensure deep understanding rather than rote memorization. Without targeted intervention, these areas may limit Mike’s ability to organize knowledge and apply it flexibly. Recommendations include providing emotional support, structured routines, and explicit instruction in categorization and conceptual understanding. Regular check-ins and scaffolding can help Mike process and internalize new material more effectively.

Curriculum Effectiveness

Complete Curriculum: Effective. The comprehensive approach aligns with Mike's broad cognitive strengths, especially when visual and conceptual supports are integrated.

Phonics (Abeka Phonics): Effective. The structured, visual nature of Abeka Phonics supports Mike’s visual and verbal memory strengths, aiding in reading and spelling.

Language Arts/Reading (Fix It Grammar, IEW Structure and Style): Partially effective. While Mike’s verbal memory and speech development support success, the associative approach to categorization may hinder grammar mastery. Supplement with explicit grammar instruction and systematic categorization exercises.

Math (Beast Academy, AoPS): Highly effective. The visual, conceptual, and problem-solving focus of Beast Academy aligns well with Mike’s strengths in visual and abstract thinking, supporting advanced mathematical understanding.

Science (Apologia Elementary Science, Berean Builders Science): Effective. Both curricula benefit from Mike’s visual and structural memory, as well as the ability to generalize and synthesize information. Use visual aids and hands-on experiments to further support learning.

Spelling (All About Spelling): Effective. The multisensory, structured approach leverages Mike’s visual and verbal memory strengths, supporting spelling acquisition.

Social Studies (The Story of the World): Partially effective. While Mike’s verbal memory aids in narrative comprehension, the curriculum may benefit from added visual organizers and explicit categorization activities to support systematic knowledge building.

In summary, Mike’s cognitive strengths provide a solid foundation for academic success, particularly in math, science, and language arts. Addressing anxiety and supporting systematic categorization and conceptual understanding will further enhance learning outcomes. Most current curricula are effective, with minor adjustments recommended for grammar and social studies to better align with Mike’s learning profile.
INFORMATION PROCESSING SPEED:
70% Good Level

INFORMATION PROCESSING FOCUS:
96% Good Level

There are no reasons for concern. However, it should be remembered that if Mike still makes mistakes, they can no longer be considered accidental - due to inattentiveness. Mike is fine with attentiveness. The reason for the mistakes is a lack of knowledge or misunderstanding of the material.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
41
51
12
33
47
59
58
41
22
55
0
0
1
4
2
1
0
1
2
4
Mistakes
(60 max)
Speed
(60 max)
Minute
CONCEPTUAL-INTUITIVE THINKING:
67% Average Level, Normal

Mike shows an average level of development in conceptual-intuitive thinking. This suggests that the necessary foundations for developing fully-fledged conceptual thinking are present, but the prognosis remains uncertain. Thinking does not evolve on its own; the concept of 'maturation' does not apply, and progressive age-related changes may never occur naturally. Therefore, Mike needs support in developing full-fledged conceptual thinking. Adults must consistently ensure that Mike is not just memorizing and repeating material but also correctly understanding it.
Emotional Perception in Cognitive Decision-Making
When presented with an image containing a dog, a hedgehog, a squirrel, and a hare, and asked to select the odd one out, the choice of the hedgehog suggests the use of emotional-imaginative thinking. This cognitive process relies on emotionally rich images as the primary way of perceiving and processing information. Instead of logical analysis, decisions are influenced by personal feelings and emotions. Emotional-imaginative thinking plays a key role in developing empathy, creativity, and the ability to understand others' emotional experiences.
Visual Pattern Recognition in Cognitive Decision-Making
When presented with a sequence of images—a polka-dotted coffee cup, a polka-dotted vase with flowers, a polka-dotted coffee pot, and a knife—and asked to select the odd one out, the choice of the knife suggests the use of formal-visual thinking rather than logical reasoning. This cognitive process focuses on external, visually perceived characteristics such as shape, color, and pattern, without deeper analysis of meaning or functional relationships. In this case, the knife stood out due to the absence of a polka-dot design. While formal-visual thinking plays a key role in artistic creativity and design, it may be insufficient for tasks requiring abstract or critical thinking.
LINEAR VISUAL THINKING:
91.67% Good Level

Mike's linear visual thinking is well-developed. Elementary analysis in visual thinking is evident. Mike can perceive the whole and its parts separately, understands their non-identity, and can distinguish and abstract the properties of objects as independent subjects of consideration, separate from the object itself. Mike is capable of independently and spontaneously using auxiliary graphic materials and consciously turns to them when encountering difficulties.

STRUCTURAL VISUAL THINKING:
75% Good Level

Mike's structural visual thinking is well-developed. Elementary analysis in visual thinking is evident. Mike can perceive the whole and its parts separately, understands their non-identity, and can distinguish and abstract the properties of objects as independent subjects of consideration, separate from the object itself. Mike is capable of independently and spontaneously using auxiliary graphic materials and consciously turns to them when encountering difficulties.

Mike is not yet able to identify regular connections between objects and phenomena and does not rely on them in their reasoning.

DYNAMIC VISUAL THINKING:
75% Good Level

Mike demonstrates a good level of development in dynamic visual thinking. This type of thinking is primarily effective when information is presented visually, though its application may not extend broadly to other areas. The use of tables significantly enhances Mike's understanding and assimilation of material. Mike also more easily grasps basic functional relationships when they are expressed in graphical form.

COMBINATORY VISUAL THINKING:
75% Good Level

Mark demonstrates a good level of development in visual combinatory thinking. This skill will support Mark in solving problems not only in mathematics but also in physics, chemistry, and biology. If abstract thinking is less developed, visual combinatory thinking can serve as a compensatory mechanism, enabling Mark to maintain good academic performance in mathematics, even up to higher education.
CONCEPTUAL-LOGICAL THINKING:
83% Good Level

Mike has a good level of conceptual logical thinking development. Mike easily identifies cause-and-effect relationships, understands the essence of proofs, can explain and prove things correctly, and apply solutions by analogy. This forms the basis for general learning ability.
VERBAL ANALOGIES:

Mike was presented with the words "table" and "tablecloth." Based on the same connection linking "table" and "tablecloth," Mike was asked to find a pair for the word "floor." Mike chose "furniture." This choice suggests that the type of preconceptual thinking Mike uses to compensate for not yet fully developed conceptual logical thinking is situational-imagery thinking. In this case, Mike does not analyze the connection between the words in the first pair or use it to construct the second pair of words. Instead, Mike seems to combine all three words into a single unified image and selects an appropriate word based on that image. For example, in this task, Mike forms an image of a room and chooses "furniture" as the word that fits the overall image.
Superficial Analogies Based on Visual or Structural Symmetry
The child was shown a window and a house, and asked to find an analogy for an eye. The answer chosen was a door.

This choice reflects visual-schematic thinking. Both window–house and eye–door can be seen as part–whole structures (a window is part of a house; an eye is part of a face or head). However, the chosen pair may be based more on visual or symbolic symmetry than on deeper conceptual reasoning.

Recommendation:
Guide the child to differentiate between visual resemblance and logical categorization. Use examples that help them understand what is a part, what is a category, and what is a function. Encourage them to ask: “What role does this object play?” or “Why are these two together?” This builds awareness of essential properties and logical structure.
Contextual Visual Pairing Without Conceptual Analysis
The child was shown a bedside table and a tree, and then asked to find a match for a notebook. The selected answer was a school desk.

This choice likely results from contextual visual grouping—pairing two items that commonly appear together (notebook and school desk), without analyzing the type of relationship in the first pair. The original combination (bedside table and tree) lacks a strong conceptual link, suggesting the child relied on contextual familiarity rather than logic.

Recommendation:
To promote deeper analysis, avoid examples involving familiar settings that may mislead through routine associations. Instead, use abstract or unusual pairings to challenge the child to think about roles, categories, and structures. Reinforce the idea that not all things that “go together” in daily life form valid logical pairs.
Egocentric, Emotionally Driven Thinking
The child was shown grapes and cherries, and then asked to find a match for a hippopotamus. The child chose a leaf.

This choice indicates subjective and emotionally driven thinking, often tied to egocentric logic. The child may have reasoned, “I eat berries, and the hippopotamus eats leaves,” thereby injecting a personal experience into the task. Instead of identifying structural or conceptual connections, the child redefined the problem based on their own viewpoint.

Such thinking is common among emotionally impressionable children, who often focus on what is vivid, memorable, or emotionally meaningful. Their reactions are guided more by what feels right than by what logically fits.

Recommendation:
Use emotionally neutral examples to reduce misinterpretation. During tasks, encourage children to pause after their initial reaction and re-express the logic behind their choice. Help them understand that strong or colorful impressions may be misleading, and teach them to look for subtle but correct features. Through guided comparison, help them learn to distinguish between what is interesting and what is essential—a key step toward more objective and structured reasoning.
SHORT-TERM VERBAL MEMORY:
44% Average Level. Normal

Mike easily integrates into the logic of a story, understands all reasoning and evidence, while ignoring various digressions and insignificant details.

SHORT-TERM VISUAL MEMORY:
50% Good Level

Mike has developed structural visual memory. This is a more advanced form of visual memory than simple associative memory. While associative memory connects information in a linear chain, structural visual memory organizes it in a complex, interconnected way. This not only accumulates information but also transforms it over time. Linear connections in memory allow for sequential review and reproduction with limited ability for analysis or comparison. Imaginative linear enlargement just increases the amount of memorized information without enabling analysis. In contrast, structural connections present information simultaneously and holistically. This allows Mike to link elements, analyze internal connections, and perform various transformations. This marks the beginning of working memory. Structural memory also allows for later rethinking of information. Mike might understand a teacher's explanation after some time, even if it wasn't clear initially. This automatic transformation in the mind leads to sudden comprehension.

RECOMMENDATION:

Children with weakened memory are recommended to have the lesson content explained to them in advance. Parents can help with this. If the material is partially (or at least generally) familiar to Mike, the recognition process is triggered, which compensates for memory deficiencies and facilitates understanding.
ANXIETY:
57% High Level

A high level of anxiety indicates that the child is struggling to cope with life’s challenges and is in a state of emotional destabilization. This heightened anxiety disrupts their ability to respond appropriately to daily situations, leaving them overwhelmed and emotionally fragile.Children experiencing this level of anxiety may find it increasingly difficult to navigate both academic and social settings. Their emotional state can lead to a cycle of stress and further destabilization, creating challenges in areas where they might otherwise thrive.

EMOTIONS IN COLOR: A CHILD'S VIEW:

School color: School color: black Children who associate black with school typically dislike everything related to studying and openly express their feelings. First graders and older elementary school students rarely choose black. This preference is more common among preschoolers attending development and school preparation centers (up to 20%). These children often feel exhausted by dull lessons and parental pressure, which leads them to develop an early dislike for school (and preparation centers as well). However, according to our research, most of these children change their perspective once they begin school. They realize it’s not as bad as they had imagined.

Home color: Home color: blue This color is preferred by sensitive and impressionable children who are also calm and balanced. They tend to have a refined taste and a well-developed sense of aesthetics. These children seek deep personal connections rather than superficial playtime interactions. If this need is met at home—Mike feels happy and content. However, if this need remains unmet for a long time, it still persists as a positive emotional attitude for Mike.

Answer color: Answer color: brown This color is often chosen by anxious children who frequently experience emotional or physical discomfort, such as feeling unwell, nausea, stomachaches, or fear. When Mike associates brown with answering at the board or in front of the class, it may indicate they feel overwhelmed or uncomfortable in such situations. This could stem from struggles with learning, fear of making mistakes publicly, or low confidence. In some cases, choosing brown may also reflect underlying physical issues, such as chronic health conditions or past injuries, which might affect Mike's ability to engage confidently and comfortably during these moments.

Recess color: Recess color: yellow Yellow is often associated with optimistic, hopeful, and cheerful children. When Mike associates yellow with recess, it reflects a positive and upbeat attitude. Mike likely enjoys socializing, engaging in lighthearted play, and trying new activities. They may approach recess with enthusiasm, seeing it as a chance to have fun and connect with others.

ENERGY Overexcitement. Most often, it is the result of Mike working at the limit of their capabilities, rather than in an optimal mode, leading to rapid exhaustion. It requires normalization of the pace of activity, work and rest regime, and sometimes a reduction of workload is necessary.

MOOD The emotional state is normal. Mike can both rejoice and be sad; there are no reasons for concern, and adaptation is proceeding normally.

RECOMMENDATION:

  1. Focus on Parental Guidance The primary focus should be on working with parents to identify and address the underlying causes of the child’s anxiety. Strategies aimed solely at the child, such as gradual desensitization or role-playing exercises to alleviate stress, often target symptoms rather than root causes.Consulting with parents is particularly crucial for younger children, who are deeply connected to their family environment, especially their mother. Effective intervention depends on improving the home environment. Direct work with the child is most effective when they develop some level of personal autonomy, which typically occurs around grades 4–6.
  2. Classroom Support Teachers play a significant role in alleviating the child’s anxiety, especially during critical adaptation periods like starting school. Educators should implement a supportive approach, including:Allowing the child to answer only from their seat and focusing on homework-related questions.Avoiding impromptu questioning or public criticism.Offering consistent praise for achievements, no matter how small.Maintaining a calm and patient tone, avoiding shouting or abrupt changes in demeanor.Providing a nurturing and structured environment reduces stress and promotes confidence. Without such measures, the child’s emotional state could worsen, prolonging the adaptation period to six months or longer.
  3. Avoid Over-Reliance on Training Programs Training programs designed to reduce anxiety or boost self-esteem have limited effectiveness if the child’s home environment remains unchanged. While the child may appear confident during training, this progress often does not transfer to real-life situations.For Mike, the most effective approach combines parental consultation with thoughtful support from educators. A holistic strategy addressing the home environment and the school setting will help stabilize the child’s emotional well-being and foster their resilience over time.
Image 7: Washing Up (Neutral Household Situation)
Negative Reaction: A negative reaction may occur if the child's parents are overly focused on cleanliness, neatness, and routine. Frequent corrections such as “comb your hair,” “fix your shirt,” “button up,” or “wash your hands” can create a sense of pressure and frustration.
The situation may be especially difficult if the child is naturally slow in their actions. Being rushed or hurried, combined with persistent corrections, can lead to feelings of inadequacy or stress.
Image 10: Competition Situation (Emotionally Negative Situation)
Positive Reaction: A positive reaction may occur if the child is active and confident in standing up for themselves. Both boys and girls may perceive the scenario as playful rather than confrontational.
Children who react positively often explain their choice of a happy face with comments like, “The kids here are just playing and goofing around.”
Image 12: Isolation or Ignoring the Child by Other Children (Emotionally Negative Situation)
Negative Reaction: A negative response to this image may stem from two main factors:

  • High Intellectual Awareness: Some individuals, regardless of their personal social experiences, may objectively recognize the scene as one of isolation. Their reaction reflects empathy and an understanding of the emotional undertones of exclusion.
  • Personal Experience of Social Exclusion: Those who have faced rejection or exclusion from group activities may strongly relate to the scenario, making it an emotionally sensitive and impactful trigger.
ABSTRACT THINKING:
100% Good Level

Mike has a Good Level of abstract thinking, meaning they can go beyond concrete objects and events to analyze and synthesize information at a higher, more abstract level. This can show up in several ways:

Ability to Generalize: Mike recognizes common features and connections among different objects and ideas, even if they seem unrelated.

Logical Thinking: Mike can reason, draw conclusions, and solve problems using abstract principles, not just concrete facts.

Analytical Skills: Mike can break down complex ideas or problems into smaller parts for better understanding.

Synthesis Skills: Mike can combine separate ideas into a cohesive whole, forming new concepts or theories.

Understanding Abstract Concepts: Mike grasps ideas like justice, freedom, or love—concepts that can’t be directly sensed.

Spatial Imagination: Mike can mentally picture and manipulate spatial relationships.

Math and Science Aptitude: Mike understands and applies mathematical and scientific concepts, which often require abstract thinking.

Language Skills: Mike understands and uses language structures, idioms, and metaphors, which also rely on abstract thought.

Strong abstract thinking is key to learning and adapting, helping Mike deeply understand material, solve problems, and think creatively.



Note: The level of abstract thinking is influenced not only by the results of completed tasks but also by the levels of conceptual-logical and visual thinking.
SPEECH DEVELOPMENT:
83% Good Level

Good level of speech development. Mike demonstrates a good level of speech development.

RECOMMENDATION:

Children like Mike with high levels of anxiety need conditions that optimize their school adaptation process. Moreover, it is important that at home Mike fully and loudly recounts their oral lessons, thinks through, and articulates answers to questions they may be asked at school in advance. Preparation for upcoming school lessons (at least initially) should be thorough, down to the smallest detail, so that during the lesson itself, Mike encounters as few unexpected issues as possible. If school life proceeds without major complications, then as Mike's anxiety decreases, their speech activity will naturally increase.
CONCEPTUAL CATEGORIZATION:
25% Low Level

Mike organizes information in an associative or situational manner, often relying on functional, situational, or entirely subjective groupings. This approach may hinder the development of a structured system of scientific concepts. As a result, unsystematized knowledge is more likely to be forgotten. Mike may also encounter specific challenges when learning the grammar of their native and foreign languages due to this way of processing and structuring information.
CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY THINKING:
58% Good Level

Mike, with a good level of conceptual-imagery thinking, shows strong abilities in visual analysis, categorization, and making intuitive connections between images. Mike handles most visual tasks with ease, grasping abstract relationships and identifying similarities and differences in complex images. Minor challenges may arise with advanced multi-layered tasks, but generally, Mike navigates visual reasoning confidently.
READING SKILL:
100% High Level

Mike has highly developed reading skills. Their reading is fluent, and linguistic abilities, a sense of language, and literary expression are beginning to emerge.
REPRESENTATIONAL SYSTEM:
Balanced Representational System

Mike has a balanced representational system. This means that auditory, visual, and kinesthetic channels are equally developed. Mike is able to understand and process information through listening, observing, and hands-on experience with similar ease. Such children adapt well to different teaching styles — whether the material is explained verbally, shown visually, or practiced physically. This flexibility is a strength, allowing Mike to thrive in a variety of subjects. At the same time, it's helpful to observe which formats Mike naturally gravitates toward in order to offer the most effective support when challenges arise.
What do these results mean in real life?
Explore how each cognitive skill connects to real school subjects and curriculum choices
Made on
Tilda